4.3 Unit 4 References » Unit 4 References
Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2012). A 21 word solution. Available at SSRN
2160588.
Brown, S. D., Furrow, D., Hill, D. F., Gable, J. C., Porter, L. P., & Jacobs, W. J. (2014). A duty to describe: Better the devil you know than the devil you don’t. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 626-640.
Aczel, B., Szaszi, B., Sarafoglou, A., Kekecs, Z., Kucharský, Š., Benjamin, D., ... & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2020). A consensus-based transparency checklist. Nature human behaviour, 4(1), 4-6.
Kitzes, J., Turek, D., & Deniz, F. (Eds.). (2018). The Practice of Reproducible Research: Case Studies and Lessons from the Data-Intensive Sciences. Oakland, CA: University of California Press. http://www.practicereproducibleresearch.org/
Sandve, G. K., Nekrutenko, A., Taylor, J., & Hovig, E. (2013). Ten simple rules for reproducible
computational research. PLoS Comput Biol, 9(10), e1003285.
Blischak, J. D., Davenport, E. R., & Wilson, G. (2016). A quick introduction to version control with Git and GitHub. PLoS computational biology, 12(1), e1004668.
Fortunato, L., Galassi, M. (2021). The case for free and open source software in research and
scholarship. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 379(2197), 20200079.
Carpentry: for data : https://datacarpentry.org/ and for software: https://software-carpentry.org/
Stack Exchange:http://https://stackexchange.com/
Github:http://https://github.com/